I'm tired of this back and forth blabber. I think this, you think that, I'm done debating (believe it or not :p)
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 6 of 8
-
Intellectualist BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
mattybillo1 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
You choosing to stop debating, suggests you have no real reply to what I said. It is a way out.
^
|
Off topic. GOLD INGOTS RULE! -
Intellectualist BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
I'm not getting out.
It's like religion. You believe this, they believe that. -
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
I find this arguing unnecessary. I don't think andrew would want to see this.
Fact:
Farming is much more profitable than mining and MOST LIKELY always will be that way.
Opinion:
Gold should go up (Which does need a little bump)
I rest my case. -
RyanBlocks2 EcoLeaderEcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
mattybillo1 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
In the case of the debating, which you called arguing, that is the purpose of this forum to debate about ideas not just to post +1. -
mattybillo1 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
-
Intellectualist BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
mattybillo1 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
I also hate how you logic for believing this suggestion shouldn't be added is it doesn't make much difference. Just because the difference isn't massive it should still be change if it is going to have positive effect. And you agreed it would have a positive effect on the server. -
Intellectualist BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
If the masses see ALL the pluses and cons and agree mainly on one way, good or bad, then I'd say that in ECC it's a good reason to add something. But Andrew has the final word in everything. -
mattybillo1 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
I am sorry but this is the most stupid post you have made, I enjoyed debating with you, but this is too far. Everything you said has been proved wrong, the masses agree, if inflation was an issue farming would be targeted, you also suggest this is helping my balance yet before you claimed this makes no difference. You contrast you own ideas. You do not seem to looks at logic but more proving people wrong, I rightly listed positives and negatives of raising gold ingots you seem to never agree with any positives, even though the evidence is there, and only attempt to prove people wrong, you do it on other suggestions too. You only aim is too argue and prove people wrong and not use logic to decide whether it is a good suggestion or not. In regards to this suggestion, you cannot disagree mining makes less money than farming and it would be fair to close the gap between farming and mining and this would help do that. -
RyanBlocks2 EcoLeaderEcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
xX3PICREBELXx JiggaBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoMaster ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
-
RyanBlocks2 EcoLeaderEcoLeader ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
Bump
-
Schwungrad BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️
As long as there are users buying gold ingots for more than the server price, there's no need for a price change. Server price is for items that have no significant demand from users (like pumpkins - apologies to everyone who is actually building a pumpkin pyramid), but should still be able to serve as a source of income to users.
Furthermore, exactly because gold is so rare, it's not a good idea to increase gold price if your goal is to give mining an advantage over farming. Increasing redstone from 2.50 to 3 or coal from 1 to 1.50 would probably increase the average profit of one mining run more than increasing gold from 10 to 20.
Page 6 of 8