Change-
"A player has pm'd you stating that they've purchased a feature via /buyfeature. After buying the feature they learn they could've bought a booster and saved a lot of money. They're being insistent about getting their money back. How do you react to the situation?"
To-
"A player has pm'd you stating that they've purchased a feature via /buy. After buying the feature they learn they could've bought a booster and saved a lot of money. They're being insistent about getting their money back. How do you react to the situation?"
It triggers me
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
mukund2345 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
Even with changing it from /buyfeature to /buy, the question is still irrelevant anyhow, as boosters are no longer a thing. The entire question needs to be replaced. Ideally it should be something along the lines of "A player has pm'd you stating that they've purchased a feature via /buy. After buying the feature they learn that a store sale was coming and could have saved a lot of money. They're being insistent about getting their money back. How do you react to the situation?" Or just replace it with an entirely different question.
-
Agree x 3 - List
-
-
Hunter_Greyback BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️
Yes, a change probably should be made for upcoming applications. For now, we can always see it as a question ECC members can test their knowledge of the server's past with:p
-
This cycle ends in 3 days and the app will be changed then. I don't see a need for a suggestion here, and changing an app 3 days before the scheduled change makes no sense.
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
ClarinetPhoenix She does what she wants.Owner Events Manager ECC Sponsor Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ IX ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade Wiki Leader
As we already have a system in place that rotates irrelevant questions out on Staff Applications I will be denying this.
-
Winner x 1 - List
-
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.