Buffing the rest won't solve anything. It will just overly inflate the economy. SG was needlessly buffed, and now needs to be nerfed again.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 3 of 3
-
kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
-
Agree x 1 -
Potato x 1 - List
-
-
kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
-
-
Agree x 2 - List
-
-
matrix_rep Runner Up in BB20Mythic ⚔️ I ⚔️ ECC Sponsor Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐⭐ XI ⭐⭐ Premium Upgrade
@Conorx come back when you play an hour of SG LMK how much you make
-
-
Potato x 1 - List
-
-
An overwhelming majority of the users who oppose a survival games nerf are the people who benefit from the overpowered amount of money you can make from it... hm... what a coincidence, right?
-
Potato x 2 - List
-
-
(apart from me, I don't play sg)
You're the one avoiding my point which is that if SG was able to consistently make more money than anything else, there should always be people playing it regardless of what time it is. That simply isn't the case, though.-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
Digger0208 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️
It is Nicit... I would say he is a trusted user. Jk you can never trust Nicit - he's gona take over the server :p
-
-
TheBluePickle BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
If we take the quintessential kit user on Eco City Craft and pit him against other users who have no kits on a peak hour, then he will make an extremely large amount of money. If we take multiple quintessential kit users and pit them against each other, then the person with the better PvP skills will most likely win the majority of games. This won't result in that much money, but it is still something to worry about. If we take two people who have absolutely no kits at all and pit them against each other, then they will probably both win an equal amount of times. Like someone said above, they can make 20k an hour from doing this. On a non-peak hour too. This is only 5k less than efficiency seven mining. Something clearly has to be done about survival games.
You said that survival games can simply not produce that much opulence because not enough users play it, regardless of what time it is. We have given you solid facts and math, and you respond by saying that it can't be the case just because not enough users play it? How are we supposed to control how many people play survival games? Some people don't see the amount of money that can be made or don't want to invest in kits that will eventually return your money and then some. Simply saying that users don't play survival games so it must not make any money is superficial. You need to look beyond what is obvious to see the truth about the amount of money survival games makes.
You have also posted two screenshots showing that there are no users playing and that therefore survival games must be horrible. Two things are incorrect here. The first one that I can think of is that you could have easily taken a screenshot at a non-peak hour. And honestly, Nicit, do you really expect there to be people on survival games every hour of the day? There will always be times when survival games is devoid of play. That's axiomatic. Now for the second thing that is incorrect here. You again use the logic that since no one plays survival games at times, it must be horrible. I have already debunked this above so doing it again would just waste time.
-
TheBluePickle BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
We should nerf survival games.
+1 -
kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
Everyone's arguing peak and offpeak... but nobody realizes you can make $1600 per 1v1 match? If 2 people were to 1v1 each other for an hour they'd make like 40k. 20k each. Without any features or anything. And that's including the 1 minute wait time, 1 minute grace period, and assuming a match takes 20-30 seconds.
-
TheBluePickle BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️
-
I hope everyone is remembering the fact that with the 60-70k per hour, everyone and their brother will soon have star tools. Less than 20 hours per tool, they will soon have no value. The real value will be in tools that still do a good job and yet will not hurt too bad when you lose them in the end.
-
Of course why people would buy star tools when they're making 50k/hr in the end is a different question entirely.-
Friendly x 1 - List
-
Page 3 of 3