You adding a download site and video again to something that was already mod edited is pretty relevant

 

Will you please answer my question. Will this be coded by us or is it already out there/downloadable. Please answer.

 

Look at ur post on page three. Mod edited.

 

I'm asking how will this be done? All they have to do is type ".hacktest"? Or is some sort of plugin that we make?

 

I don't quite think you understand. Someone successfully passing your "test" will appear to have said .hacktest, and someone who does not pass will appear to have said nothing. In such an eventuality, what is there to screenshot?

 

That they didn't do is what I'm getting out of it. It doesn't make much sense.

 

May I ask what a screen shot of someone 'failing' to type something in local looks like? I have plenty of screenshots with random text in them. A 'negative' screenshot cannot hold up as evidence of anything. A positive screenshot (proof of hacks) is the only way to truly prove something. This is a basic idea in science... If something doesn't show up a million times it is not proof that it's not there, however if it does show up once it's proof that it is there.

 

So from what im getting, is that you are saying that a mod must pm a user and tell them to type it?

I have every right to ignore a staff member, and the staff member has no right to bother me simply because they want to test if i have a hacked client. This is not disrespecting staff, not even close (so don't get that idea in your head now).

What if I decide to disconnect right as soon as the mod pms me? I hit disconnect alot and rejoin shortly after.
What if Im afk? I know this has been said before, but there is still no answer for this.

Also why should we disable /ch qm? Its only purpose is for powertooling trade chat advertisements, making it easier to trade/auction items. The point of a donation is to make things easier, so I don't see why /ch qm should ever be removed.


This, and the recent troll "star hoe" suggestions, are some of the dumbest suggestions I have ever seen. This will NEVER work out, and even if there was a way for it to work out it would require way to much work on a developer to make this (and keep it updated).


I know! How bout instead of this we just ban all users who ever get a complaint on them for hacking. This has as much of a chance at happening as what you are suggesting.

 

Also, where does the credibility of the user who is complaining come from?

 

Mods have way too much going on for this type of evidence. Plus I do not use any video software so I could not video. Plus when I was a mod and even now I do not and cannot follow every conversation and thing going on well enough to see every message, let alone screenshot them. I have got side tracked mid convo and stopped replying. Also with undoing /ignore it would take away the entire reason of having /ignore. At some point you have to just realize it is not a plausible suggestion and move on. Kuke gave you all the proof and reasons it's not long ago. Instead since you are clearly very much interested in this topic spend some time formulating a new and improved detection method. Why bother trying to fix an old broken bike if you can just make a new better one?