1. TaylorBros22 ***Ex-EcoLegend***
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    3,127
    Trophy Points:
    85,160
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +2,223
    Or have it so that anything that would be classed as spammy in chat (i.e. something a mod would warn for) is not allowed in a username
     
    • Agree x 2
    • Potato x 1
    • List
  2. kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯ
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,007
    Trophy Points:
    84,160
    Ratings:
    +6,910
    Yeah, let's make it even more arbitrary, great idea. "this usernames looks kinda annoying and spammy. Ban."
    The rules for spam aren't even set in stone. I've seen people get warned for typing 'lmaooo'.
     
  3. TaylorBros22 ***Ex-EcoLegend***
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2013
    Messages:
    3,127
    Trophy Points:
    85,160
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +2,223
    It would not just be down to one moderator to decide- It is likely the GA or SA team would be consulted before a ban.
     
  4. UnitedStates2 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    82,660
    Ratings:
    +6,293
    That's still arbitrary. You're still having multiple staff members decide what's "spammy" or not on a personal whim than using any reason or logic. We don't even have rules/staff guidelines stating what spam even is, so how do you even expect staff to consistently enforce this?
     
  5. SuburbSomeone Shrubby Tycoon
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,301
    Trophy Points:
    78,090
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +6,465
    Now that I think about it, I'd rather have Mojang make some sort of rule about this rather than ECC.
     
  6. UnitedStates2 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    82,660
    Ratings:
    +6,293
    Because Mojang is totally going to prohibit paying users who own premium accounts from changing their names to what they wish. Doubt it.
     
  7. SuburbSomeone Shrubby Tycoon
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,301
    Trophy Points:
    78,090
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +6,465
    Exactly.

    But anyway, +0. If we don't want spammy names, then don't make it worth it for people to have them. I don't know if we should amend the rules or not but I do think that it's better to discourage rather than ban for a month. If possible, I'd like to see a day-long tempban whenever a spammy username occurs, and following that they can be nicknamed a la Turt and Austins.
     
  8. Nicit6 N6
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ II ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2013
    Messages:
    9,816
    Trophy Points:
    106,160
    Ratings:
    +8,040
    But then what's spammy and what's not? Without a finite metric you're literally banning people on a whim.

    The ONLY solution to the issue is to stop worrying about it.
     
  9. SuburbSomeone Shrubby Tycoon
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    3,301
    Trophy Points:
    78,090
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +6,465
    I don't think it's the only solution... but it may just be the best given how heated this argument has become.