I'll be tagging unknown to investigate. @Unknownrider
Let me remind all users, DO NOT post irrelevant/unnescessary comments on complaints unless you have evidence supporting this complaint.

 

Sorry if this is irrelevant but you should probably tag khobbits and revan, they have dealt with oink recently.

 

@matthew_gruber Softly said not to post unnecessarily and that was not necessary. Please do not post unless you have supporting evidence, as she stated. This is the final warning being given on this complaint. The next one will be an official forum warning.

 

This is evidence I believe. Based on this hit delivered on lolelf is simply enough evidence to warrant a ban. There was lag at the end of lolelf's death, but during the hits being delivered there was no lag, to hardly any at all. This is a screen shot of the hit being delivered, and the way oink facing is clearly aim bot, or force field. Based on the amount of complaints I believe this is being covered up just because Georgie is his brother, and hes an smod. Because after every complaint posted the need is felt to claim its lag or not sufficient enough. So shouldnt more be done about this?

 

Shotgun,

This quote is from a previous hacking complaint, the very same the screenshot you provided above was denied to be any sort of hacked client evidence. You know this. Here is the link, in case you have forgotten which complaint it was on. You knew this was not viable evidence, yet you chose to ignore my warning, and Revan's, and you used already denied evidence.

Due to your previously denied evidence, your knowledge it was not useful, and in accordance with Revan's statement above, you will be receiving a forum warning for posting unnecessary posts on complaints. If at any point you find fresh evidence that has not been used/denied on previous complaints, feel free to post here or in your own complaint.

 

Cardinalhalk, the issue has been looked into by myself, KHobbits, and Unknownrider. Please calm down and let the staff do their job. Andrew has no reason to be bothered with something like this. As I have informed you before, if Andrewkm's attention is needed, the staff will bring his attention to it.

 

The videos that have been posted as evidence for this complaint have already been viewed and dismissed in previous complaints. I'm sure you know, when making a new you'll need to provide us with new evidence or it will be dismissed.

I would like to state as well, while it may not be valid in terms of "deciding if this user is guilty," I want to make this clear. It was not just a simple screenshot that Georgie0417 showed to me that has me set on Oink__oink_, we used Skype screen share on both his household computer and person computer. During this procedure, I had Georgie0417 navigate to the Minecraft mods folders and cycle through every mod with their contents, navigate to the versions folder and cycle through every file with their contents. Then, I had him navigate to the Windows downloads folder for any files, nothing in there pertained to Minecraft hacked clients. Lastly, I had him navigate to his browser history and Google search history for any signs of even clicking on a hacking client website/download. Once again, there was nothing. I even had Oink__oink_ screen share with me on Skype during one of his SG matches, to which he proceeded to destroy anyone he came into contact with. No hacking was involved.

Now that is off the table, you may still judge based on whether you feel Georgie0417 and Oink__oink_ are lying or not, but now you have the full story. Once again, my personal input on the matter does not determine the outcome. If you have a solid video to provide, I will be more than happy to look it over, investigate the material, and decide from there. Until then however...

No evidence of hacking.
Locked