Added.

 

No, not everyone has the same thing. Yes, kits take some skill it's true, but the battle is over after a few bow shots or sword hits. This makes it the "no-skill, whoever can hit faster games".

And yes, it is an advantage if you are good at PvP with kits, but once again the battles are over too quickly. And to summarize the words of one of the best PvP'ers on YouTube "If you want to test your skill, 1v1'ing with full iron and a stone sword is the best way to determine how skilled you are. Diamond swords kill people in 4 crit hits but stone sword fights last longer and give you the ability to survive."

No kits requires a lot more skill as battles last longer, the ability to analyse a fight (knowing when to run, how to press your advantage etc) and your knowledge of the map and therefore your knowledge of the location of chests. So yes, very much skill. With your last half of your last statement seems to me you were describing kitting, not normal SG, "...the ability to click your mouse n swing. so much skill". Yes, that is what kitting means.

I personally think that the "Minecraft Survival Games" was started up because people wanted to reenact the popular books/movies of the Hunger Games. I have read all the books and watched all the movies that have come out and I am 100% sure that people couldn't "buy" upgrades that made them very over powered.

So now it's just a question of:
1. Should we remove all kits?
2. Should we remove some kits?

And once again, for those of you who may not have read the whole thing properly, I want a tournament where the winner is the most SKILLFUL not the person with the most kits.

 

Added more options to the poll and allowed additional response. Just click "Change Your Vote" to vote for 2 options.

 

Bump

 

Which is why Red said "everyone can participate and enjoy it"

 

Bump

 

Bump

 

No flame baiting please.