If they were invisible maybe... it works suck to see someone and chase them down only to have them be invulnerable because they "spectating"

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

spectators could give people's locations away through skype and stuff.

 

Along with this information relaying, invisible spectators can get in the way of combat (ie: Stand in front of someone shooting or pvping). This is hard to explain why but it just happens. Something to do with the fact that the player is still technically there, just invisible.

 

True, unless we made it an interactive part of the gameplay.

You want to farm melons as a pro? Get a melon sword, fly, and a 200x200 melon farm.

You want to play Sg as a pro? Get a kit, memorize the maps, and hire a spectator spy.

 

There is a plugin that teleports you when you are in the way of an arrow.

 

I'm sorry but the abuse this system could potentially have is way to large. I hope Andrewkm never makes this. There is no reason we should make it any harder/easier on certain players who have friends on Skype whispering locations. Even if you make cords In SG untraceable you can still say to your buddy "so and so is in Andrews basement." Suddenly that player knows where someone is and that person could also relay if he appears to have a kit etc. So my answer is no.

Revanrose6

 

But you haven't said anything about my idea, what are your thoughts on that?

 

I don't think that kit users need any more advantages then they already have.

 

I think I speak for a lot of people when I say that kit's are already overpowered. They practically reign SG.

 

Hijacking but....
They should make a SG that doesn't allow kits. I might play them again
Maybe...

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

I would for sure. I've played several times so far, to get the general feeling. Every time I got down to the final two players, the other guy had a kit, and killed me. I'd definitely play without kits but, ofc andrew needs the income.