Then maybe when a no kit game happens (IF they implement this) kit cooldowns aren't reset.
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
Page 2 of 4
-
ultrasonicwave BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Builder ⚒️
I think there should be a kit-free sg server, so that kitters can still use kits, because most of the time, non-kitters>>kitters
-
block_crusher Prestige 6, Ex-Ecolegend, $ EcoLeader $Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VI ⭐ Premium Upgrade
- Joined:
- Mar 27, 2012
- Messages:
- 2,894
- Trophy Points:
- 71,660
- Gender:
- Male
- EcoDollars:
- $0
- Ratings:
- +977
No.
-
weatherryan BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️
I just no longer think this will work how you are proposing it -1
-
no...
I like the idea but it just doesn't seem possible unless they removed '/kit vsg' which most people such as myself actually enjoy using in the dyer situation when you have ran out of food. so. Take whatever rating you like from this. -
SuburbSomeone Shrubby TycoonBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade
- Joined:
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages:
- 3,301
- Trophy Points:
- 78,090
- Gender:
- Male
- EcoDollars:
- $0
- Ratings:
- +6,465
Wow, the poll. 16 yes, 0 no.
-
Thankyou guys for replying with your opinions and ideas!
I just thought of the topic during an SG game where there was 1 kitter and the rest were non kitter builders, and it became a kit free game, which I thought was fair seeing as the amount of non kitters was greater then the kitters which brought me to this suggestion.
I had never thought of the complex way this would apply to users with kit vsg or various other kits, but I appreciate all your suggestions, I too am confused how this will work, however will have a think about it.
Keep the ideas coming, thankyou for your positive feedback to this suggestion!
-icondigi -
But we can suggest ideas, can't we? As far as I can tell, there is no "whining", merely a suggestion to rebalance the pay-to-win atmoshpere that SG currently creates.
-
Like x 2 -
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
Vintage_Gamer BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
The suggestion seems silly to me. I don't see why we don't just change the stakes of it being a non-kit game to 1 in 3 or 4. 1 in 8 with 4 arenas is silly.
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
weatherryan BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️It is 1/4 as phys has said in chat
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️Can you provide proof of this? I seriously doubt it's a 1/4 chance of a no kit...
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
Are you sure you're not just saying that because you have a lot of kits? It's a suggestion.. It's not in your control nor should it ever be.
-
StanleyMines [Resident] [VIP] [Semi-Active] [Ex-President]Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade
The chances of this being implemented are small. People donated for ++ kits to use kit EVERY game, when no kit games were implemented, many were upset. This would be ok if EVERYONE voted a no kit game for each game. Everyone would have to vote that by the time game starts. No vote as to kits or no kits, would count as a vote for no kits. If even 1 person votes kits tho, then it would have to be a kit game. That is the only thing that i think will be implemented. The reason I got kits was to make money faster than mining and/or farming, no kit games have no bfr and little food, making games run really long. id say -1 to this suggestion because if it is majority, then very few games would have kits, like 1/8 with kits rather than the other way around. This isn't because I have anything against you.
-1 -
StanleyMines [Resident] [VIP] [Semi-Active] [Ex-President]Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgradeikr
-
Zach_Attack252 PresidentPresident ⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️
-1 period
-
knears2000 BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️Please learn the value of people and emotions. Thanks.
Page 2 of 4
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.