Then why did we get rid of 3 of the sites in the first place? I have no problem with nstar prices going down, or the wealth gap going down. I just don't want 3/4 of the server upset over nothing.
Reason they were removed i belive is because the sites we used went down Hill and wasnt worth it but now there is new sites out there
I agree, my only goal from this is to create a better economy with more players so that it is fun for all.
andrewkm's reasoning was that he didn't agree with the voting sites' ways and that we weren't getting much players to join from there, thus having to remove them.
Nstars should not be your main thought in this... Greedy suckers. +1 to any voting site. Adds player base to build our server. I think we'd be stupid NOT to take an opportunity to advertise.
I'm not really sure xD Yes new players are good and important. I'd also like the nstar market to be a little bit more stable xD I'll change to +1, you're right; new players are more important
I fully support any suggestion to add more voting sites to ECC. This will gain more players and be beneficial to the server as a whole. Nether star prices should be the least of our worries as it for one of is ECC's healthiest market and I can assure you that constant demand of netherstars will always be there regardless of changes in the supply. As for the value of nether stars, as many previous posters have said, an argument for keeping the gap between rich an poor is a very poor argument. +1
Pls talk to Andrew?? @JamieSinn Edit: The other vote site has noticeably added an abundance of users to ECC.
Planet Minecraft (PMC) I feel like this will bring ECC back to life. It brought us many active members in the past, including myself.
It may be because they would have to vote on so many sites I think that is what Dumderce Dymderce means (I think)
