Despite the non-existent format I agree with this.
It makes me happier having 10 tickets instead of 1. Like in those Capital One commercials, its better to have more!

 

I don't agree with this, for three reason.:

1. people are more likely to 1 ticket lottos, regardless of the price of the tickets. Let's say 10 people 1 ticket a lotto with your prices, that would be 9k less than what it was before, this also means there will be less money taken out of the economy.
2. Lottery is for the rich, and the rich like throwing with money, they're more likely to put more money in the lotto when the tickets are more expensive than when they're cheap. (It's human behaviour, not sure how to explain it)
3. it messes up my math on http://lottery.radthorne.com . ;-; (Not really a valid point, but meh)

 

yeah if each ticket was 100 i would force it since i have a lot of money now

 

Either way is fine. I'd just feel more awesome throwing in a thousand tickets instead of a measly hundred.

 

I don't really think that's a good idea. One of the main points of the lotto is for the exciting risk of it. If it costs 100, then it wouldn't be that risky would it? Anyone could easily afford it.

 

Lottery is always risky, even if it's a giant risk your gonna lose 200 bucks.

 

It used to be 100, but then we moved it up BECAUSE of so little money being taken out of the economy. Now, 500, that's reasonable.

 

We've once had 100 tick lottos, toke the whole day + it was a 4 mil lotto.

 

That was because of different rules though, they are no longer in place.

 

Correct, but the lotto will dramatically change either ways. Now a 60000 ECC lotto would turn into a profit much smaller.

 

No, imagine winning 100k with $100, wont happen

 

Hey! 1 ticketers win a lot!

1k is just fine :) takes money out of the economy and is fun