-1 Bribing was the major issue last time this was suggested. You could pay someone to leave, etc.

 

You can also just as easily pay them after the game...
Edit: That was meant to be towards Dccc, though I suppose that's just as good an argument to the op... doesn't mean it's not handy to have, though.

 

People are naturally distrusting. Most people won't leave unless they receive the money.
Although it's possible to have someone who's outside of SG to pay the user.

 

+1

If someone wants to use someone elses kit, or pay them not to, then let them do so. also, if they have enough $$$ to bribe, they should be able to. (as far as I know) bribing is not against the rules.

 

+1

Users above have stated that people are bribed to leave games etc. Now i am in full understanding when i say that most users will not leave as they are naturally untrusting. This is easily avoided by having a friend pay them.

I do however think this is handy as users often sell there kits in game. Its also a bonus because i often miss games when i am paying a team mate the winnings from the previous game.

 

This is true.

However, another problem I see, staff wouldn't be able to enforce paying someone 1k to leave. So a user could agree, receive 1k then stay in the game with no punishments

 

Screenshot contract? livestream? plenty of people run livestream sg, or video them.

 

Staff won't enforce bribes. It will be like lotto teams. We don't need more salt in sg.

 

Staff will not enforce a clearly written contract?
wow. :/

 

There is no "contract" to bribery.

 

If i were to write a contract for something saying someone would leave SG for X amount of money, and they agreed, staff would not enforce it?

 

+1 we need more bribery

 

I don't see why that contract would be approved.

 

+1

 

Thx for clarifacation nicit. :D I just figured it would be. now I know.