1. Fishie01 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2015
    Messages:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    14,350
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +10
    No
     
    #1 Fishie01, Aug 30, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2015
  2. WallaceWest Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2015
    Messages:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    43,960
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +144
    Crap idea - The owner paid for the town in first place and deserves the ownership of a town as his/her legacy. RIP.
     
  3. zr2002 Nub Moderator
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    5,384
    Trophy Points:
    69,660
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +3,154
    -1 this is exactly what claims are for.
     
  4. Fishie01 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2015
    Messages:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    14,350
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +10
    Yes but is it really fair for someone not to be able to have a town that hasn't been used
     
  5. 12345shane ρяєѕι∂єитιαℓ ρяαєтσя
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,824
    Trophy Points:
    81,160
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2,130
    -1
    This would destroy half of the point of claims. The other half is that claims can be used on inactive towns.
     
  6. WallaceWest Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2015
    Messages:
    82
    Trophy Points:
    43,960
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +144
    I agree with this - It's just ignorant. I would rather see the server stick with claims to boost the economical factors.