This can be done with thread prefixes.
Although, I don't think its needed, It makes no difference what the title says, because you still need to click and view the full thread for all the information.

 

I wouldn't say "Guilty'" or "Innocent". "Dismissed", "Handled", and "Banned" would be better.

 

+111

When it all comes down to it, I want to know what happened to them.

Dismissed = not enough evidence or not a crime
Handled = warned, temban, some sort of punishment, but forgiven
banned = "They are bad. They are now dead to us... until a successful appeal"

A choice of 3 words that tell you everything one might need to know without reading the entire thread.

 

I actually kind of like this one :p

 

We could also make it so for the ban appeals, they will say "Accepted" and "Denied"

 

double bump
(still +1)

 

Yes, I like this. It would save a good while if you could just look at the title and see what happened

 

- 1 a terrible idea.. to brand someone guilty instantly creates distrust.. example a person gets a complant for scamming.. and its branded as guilty. nobody will trust that user even if it wasnt his fault.. he house burned down and he lost his computer. if a person is guilty of scamming hacking or any other rule breaking they would be banned.. and you can check on that user with /seen. thats all users really need to know. a user that has sucessflully appealed would not show up as banned anymore with /seen. but a quick check on the forums can tell you if they have been previously banned expecially with the new "handled" ban appeals section.. this suggestion is a grab at branding people for one time incidents.

 

-1 Creates avoidable negative assumptions to be made about users.

 

if a person doesnt read a complaint, then they are in the wrong on the situation. personally i have never judged a person on the amount of complaints. i do my judging on what the complaint was about. the prefix would just be a lazy mans excuse to see a person in a bad light.