Will you post any judging results for us? It could be left anonymous, I am just curious if there is a point system or something, and how close the voting was.
Each judge was asked to make a top 10 list, and points were awarded based on the ranking in that list, with an 11th entry selected as the most creative. The actual lists, and point totals, are remaining confidential.
I did a tour so you folks could see my winning plot in more detail, INCLUDING the circuitry behind the walls.
Supersize's build is the one that had the best exterior, in my opinion. And nicodemux' building was a piece of genius on the inside.
All of these builds except #4, #2, & #8 don't deserve to win. I don't get who the judges were but all I know is that they aren't good at judging and I won't be competing next year.
I would like to point out the quote in your signature. There is no need to be a sore sport. Be happy for the people who won, and try again another time.
Are you basing this on the image posted in the winner list, or did you actually go and look at all of the plots and explore them? If you didn't walk the plots and actually look, you have no business judging how we judged each entrant.
I did go look at everyone's plot. I'm pretty sure the judges didn't go down into thomasku11's entire build, becuase he had the best one. Nico's build won because he got his music off of Youtube!
