+1 This Helps Avoid Campers, and add's a new insentive to kill :D

 

I like this idea. +1 Gets campers out of the question

 

I disagree with this.
Hungergames is about survival, not about who can get the most kills.
If someone wants to camp and wait it out till the end of the match, then so be it, just kill the camper.

What this suggestion will actually do is decrease the incentive to play hungergames, because the profit is likely to be cut in half. (Most people only kill 1-2 players)

 

I think the 75 and 25 one. End the campers

 

What is so bad about campers?

 

Why not both?
leave it at $100 and give a $100 bounty per kill... :p

 

-1

i agree with kuke.

 

-1 we want to make some money out of it at least

 

It's not fun and it ruins the game to have 3 people hiding when there are 4 left. It takes forever to find them

 

I think it would be cool if like we keep the $100 per person but add a $25-75 Prize when you kill someone, so you can get more money and it will decrease campers because they will just try to go and kill people.
It's not too much money, you can make more money while farming/Mining.
+1!

 

=1

 

I like this idea, I almost won a game and had killed 6 people when someone with a kit killed me. That was the time I killed 3point :)

 

why you so worried, kuklekuuk00? You a camper?

 

There's nothing wrong with camping. It's a Strategy. Along with running, many say it's cowardly, but it's just a Strategy. Many people take their thoughts of Call of Duty to Minecraft.

I camp, and I run. I also kill. ;)

 

I'm a camper, indeed I am, but I'm also the #1 hungergames player and I've killed many.
It's a strategy I use, it's effective when done right.

 

Keep the victory prize as it is and get 50 per kill. +1 from me!

 

I agree, campng CAN be used effectivly, but it draws out a match for so long

 

-1 I agree with kuke!
If you see them movie you will understand