Grammar Police

*except
*punctuation

*These days, people have awful GUM - Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics . . .
*The GUM Police would act as a Moderator-like rank; however, with GUM . . .
*In this way, EcoCityCraft will have a nice community aware of GUM . . .

Only tidbits; ways to better show what you are suggesting--


This thread is full of... irony? Joke it is or joke it is not, I find it highly amusing and aggravating. xD Tis neva gon' happen.

 

yh its fne wen ppl totly scew pu there grammer nd speling bcuz it doznt hurt ur eys at al

 

Still.. This suggestion is stupid.

PS. My mind has adapted to horrible writing so I can read it easily. :b

 

Wahts ralely fnuny is you dnot hvae to splel the wrod rgiht so lnog as all the crorcet letetres are tehre and the fisrt and lsat letetres are rgiht. (sorry if that hurt reading it)

 

Indeed, we are going off-topic though.

 

GRAMMARMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

This... is really dumb.
Do you realize that installing this rule would make us a target for trolls everywhere?? If you truly have an issue with a person's grammar, just /ignore them. It's as simple as that.
I see "Grammar Nazis" everywhere in youtube comments, and it always annoys me. I don't want my time or chat space wasted by people who want to 'purge all incorrect grammer from ecc'.
And you actually suggest a kick/ban punishment for bad grammar. Really?! The kind of stuff you were correcting was abbreviations suck as 'brb' and 'gtg'. That's not bad grammar. That's a chat space saver. Until you add another line off corrections.
Basically, this would be a tremendous waste. I vote NO!

 

+1-1+5-5 No I don't agree with this idea although wouldn't mind some reminders here and there

 

i say we ban/kick people for bad ideas lol, in fact lets just be a dictatorship and all gt kick ban feature through donations

 

So this suggestion is meant to be a joke?

 

Why the hell would you post in this thread?

THE LAST POST WAS IN JULY 2012!! THAT'S HALF A YEAR AGO.



Locked.