I read the investigator feature description today and found this...
Gives you access to our full LogBlock database! This works with the ice item. When holding ice you simply left click it on a block to see that blocks history. Alternately you can also right click it into an empty griefed spot to see the history of that specific section. You will also be able to click any chest to view the interaction history of it. This is great for town owners who are tired of waiting on grief reports to be handled and want to find out who did what in their regions immediately so that the specific user can be removed from their town upon investigation in a timely manner suiting their needs. Your logblock tool will also work in all worlds except the pvp world, and all locations on the entire server. This means you can sell investigative services while online to those who require it!
I remembered this thread and wondered. Reasoning see below.
http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/suggestion-change-eviction-rules.118333/#post-636489
As I understood from this thread, since LogBlock is not a valid evidence for grief reports, a user can't be removed immediately for grief. I would suggest to reword the marked paragraph from the feature description, it sounds as if you could immediately remove them from the town which is currently not possible.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
-
Agree x 1 - List
-
-
However, under the following circumstances, the 3 day eviction criteria need not be met and the user may be removed from the town:
- A user is inactive (by staff standards, this means at least 7 days offline.)
- A user who has been banned for griefing in the town or warned by a staff member as a result of a Grief Report
-
Taken in that context the description of the Investigator feature's usefulness and the actual ability to remove someone currently griefing a town, or know to have done so though a grief report is pending, are completely counter to each other. Though rare, there are times a staff member is not online to witness a grief in progress. I agree, this should be discussed and possibly reworded, either the feature rules or the eviction rules.