Simply put. Log dives are pretty much never resorted to in this kind of complaint - unless it's something quite out of the ordinary. Similarly, the /rn rule, it still exists, however if the user's name is unknown - example being the 2 complaints on "melbot" and such - there's no way of knowing who that really is, which is why we ask.

Tl;dr yes, knowing the /rn of someone is important to have

Complaints can be dismissed without it, in certain circumstances.

If the receiver of the complaint fesses up to the complaint, generally the /rn rule is dismissed, but reminded about.

 

So if Itz didnt admit it in this complaint, then 7am would have had to provide a /rn screenshot?

Just for clarification (And Thanks for Responding <3)
@oreo1227

 

Yes

 

Keep in mind, however, don't abuse the fact someone may not have taken a screenshot of it:

Whether that's changed your nickname
Take it off after the deal
Etc...

We still can, and will, do log dives if need be- regardless whether it's often used or not, we still can.

 

I have seen log posts on complaints where the logs dated back to early 2013... there may even be earlier ones, I don't know.