Although I'd prefer to keep my kits, I can see them being refunded as fair. However, just adding a set of no-kit-allowed maps would be a big kick in the face to all the people who bought kits.
Heres my counter suggestion. Do this and remove the economic benefits of winning. i.e.: The Legacy Arenas would make you no money. Therefore if you want to make money you have to compete with the kit users.
For all these kitters, you do realize that I've never met a builder that has the sense to go to legacy right? They'll all be in rising anyways, so just kill them off there
revanrose6 your idea can work for about a week. Builders will get tired of gaining no economic profit from playing and play the kit and begin arguing about it. My suggestion is that you add economic profit towards multiple kills. For example if you were to get a double kill you get 200$ triple kill 300$ and so on, maybe lower the amount you get I don't care I wouldn't make money off of either and I don't like that and I believe others will agree. My idea will encourage people to not team because of fear of getting recked and getting another person money. But will also encourage teaming for more bonuses keeping itself in perfect balance.
That, or winnings reduced to 1/4 of the original. Actually, I'm considering posting a new thread with out the "no kits in legacy" because I feel like people will actually consider my suggestion.
This suggestion is quite interesting, maybe we could use Survival Games in Legacy as testing arenas. Where users can vote for which arena they would like to see on the main Survival Games board in Rising.
Well, I guess I was wrong . I guess I also bought my kits so that I can now play on an even playing field with other kitters. Also, I wouldn't really mind if kits were completely removed from SG. It's just that I would want to be refunded if they did. And the way I see it, this removes the point of kits.
This is starting to tick me off. We bought the advantage for ALL SG's NOT half of them, ALL of them. Andrew has stated an unbelievable amount of times that he will NOT be removing kits and that they are a huge supporter for the server. Either A) By having no kits the quality of the server will decrease with less supporters B) You can play SG on another server if you care so much. We aren't holding you back.
A) You don't know that. The server managed just fine before kits were added, and I doubt he will be struggling for donations if they were removed. B) Way ahead of you.
Refund YOU? Can the server get a refund from you for all that money you received for killing non-kit users? Honestly, that "I bought my kits so that I can now play on an even playing field with other kitters" excuse is getting old. It's not about evening the playing field anymore, now it's a lot more like "look how much money I can make using these overpowered kits!"
He won't be struggling but look, it is a huge part of what supporters donate for and by removing this there will be less money. Less money means Andrew can buy less things there fore the quality of the server won't be as great.
