I'm a little confused, doesn't andrew still need to check/add the app like in Ike's?

 

This is a very good idea. The only thing I could see if too many people have the ability to do this. I think as an option, there should be a "/ch mod America David_Torento" to give trusted users the ability to mod the chat as well.

 

Only the owner of the town/nation should have these permissions, in my opinion.

 

That would work as well.

 

Still a little confused. So this would happen when the initial app was submitted?

 

It used to be that the channel owner was added as a moderator every time, with the option for the owner to choose more people to be added to the list. For example, I used to own /ch helpme and I had the entire staff team added as moderators in case they were ever in the channel.

 

Give me the money necessary for it and /ch helpme will return!

But on topic, I think that if this suggestion is readded, the ability for the channel owner to add/remove moderators themself should not be given for two reasons. 1. It takes money out the economy whenever andrew has to type the two or three lines to do it, so it's not a ton of extra work for him and 2. I can imagine people would mess something up and it would just be easier to have only one person doing the adding/removing as opposed to every channel owner doing it.

 

If it can say clear of spammers, and those fellers, then yeah it would be good for the most part.

 

I think this would be a great feature to add/reinstate. I would purchase a chat channel, but I have been worried about it spiralling our of control into a spam-fest... and if I only add people I trust 100%, well, might as well use a skype convo then...

 

If I am correct the reason that it was removed is that now you actually need to go into the config the the plugin and edit/add in the channels, owners/mods of the channels, passwords, colors etc. This may not be the correct reason however it may also be the reason.

 

Not any more with Herochat 3, its almost all command based, meaning any GA could do it.
Problem is, its a little buggy and can screw up the config if you edit it by hand.

 

(Bump)
Good idea it would be alot n9cer than wztching this guy spam and spam and spam until A. A good.mod fixes it or B. He is banned via complaont i agree def +1

 

+1
andrewkm
Would this ever be possible

 

Don't tag andrew.