Minecraft Username gaara_of_da_funk
Reason Breaching a contract
Counter-Reason In the screen shot of the agreement, it said i had to pay back or replace the sword if i stole it, it was butchered, and i wasn't even present, do not take this as a statement to say i will not pay off the sword, but, discretion in a contract benefits the person who didn't write it. I apologize and feel terrible about the missing sword and wish that it would've never had happened
Evidence i can provide a link to the screen shot:
http://gyazo.com/607e1363fb22fb8bc41a1c3c1dfc5a74
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.
Thread Tools
Thread Tools
-
Gaara_of_da_funk BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️
-
Revanrose6 Sith LordECC Sponsor Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade
Considering this breach of contract is considered a scam, a GameAdmin plus will need to handle your appeal.
zardgyer Unknownrider KMaxwell
Left Unlocked for a GameAdmin+ -
UnknownRider BuilderBuilder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️
Alright, so after reviewing over the evidence and consulting with another GameAdmin about this situation, we have come to the conclusion that Gaara_of_da_funk DOES NOT have to repay the 375k to iStomp_Kittens. For the grounds of their agreement specified that only if Gaara_of_the_funk had stolen the sword, which he didn't, would he have to give compensation for the lost Melon Sword.
I was present at the recent time when this had occurred, and I can confirm that this sword was in fact lost to the effects of server lag/glitched item sprites.
Now, while the repayment of cash for the loss of the sword does not have to be issued, I will be issuing a 1 day temporary ban, because we do, however, enforce the punishment of a user for a broken agreement.
User Temp-banned for 1 day.
$375,000 does not have to be returned.
Locked.-
Like x 1 - List
-
- Thread Status:
- Not open for further replies.