Separate names with a comma.
That's ironic given there's no internet in North. Korea and no one is allowed out. Strange, huh?
"But Oz never did give nothin' to the tin man, that he didn't, didn't already have" - America
But like, 232 of them are potato ratings lololololol
@VladimirPutin
I would be much more inclined to agree to being able to leave shouts, rather that limit them. Because when you get those spams, you're taking...
I very rarely see, which is why I don't see a reason to amend the rules for it.
"For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves many...
How often does that actually occur? The troll shouting.
I've never personally spammed shouts, but really, how common is it? 3 minutes is extremely excessive, I could understand 1 minute, but 3 is...
Because that's not what I'm saying. I'm stating that people online should see what the person is paying for.
The basis of the suggestion is to undermine the basis of a shout. By taking away the feature everyone being able to view it, it completely...
We can catch people doing this, however. Would it be tough? Yes. Would it be doable to my knowledge? Yes.
The problem is that undermines the whole purpose of a shout. The purpose of a shout is in exchange for $1,000 per shout, your message will be...
-1 We shouldn't be taxing more than 15%, which is already high enough as is, and gets the job done. There's no reason to increase this by 5%....
bump
I'm stating the fact of the majority believes that the rule should remain the same. It's adding to the suggestion by rebutting your point. I do...
Simply based off the poll, it is illogical to cater to the minority.
As I've stated before, so long as they are not harassing, nor are they flame baiting, they are well within the bounds of the rules, and everyone...
I know right? ;)
You have a differing opinion than mine, so I responded to you. That is what happened, then you went after me personally, so I went into...