Ban Appeal from steviemcawsome

Discussion in 'Rejected Ban Appeals' started by steviemcawsome, Jul 9, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. steviemcawsome

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2
    Member Name steviemcawsome

    Minecraft Username steviemcawsome

    Which server were you banned on? KitPvP

    Why were you banned from this server? Using profanity

    Why do you think you deserve another chance on the server? I deserve another chance because i feel a perm ban was to much but a eek temp ban should have been enough
     
  2. steviemcawsome

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2
    Now my last appeal was declined because i was said to be on a alt and i made another one because i think my last one did not have a sufficient amount of proof
     
  3. steviemcawsome

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2
    now I was not on a alt yesterday. but i think what your staff members have told you is wrong because i know what happened. i was given a couple of alts daniel(numbers) um james(numbers) dholbrook and rager6. these are all of my alts that was given to me by EmergencyHD. when he gives others alts he says these alts are shared accounts and that the actual owners could log onto aem at any time they wanted to. every alt he gave me i logged onto aem atleast once. now i gave dholbrook and rager6 out to other aem players and daniel(numbers) to my neighbor a couple days ago so we could play together. what i think happened was as i was banned yesterday either an aemplayer was on aem logged onto one of those alts and got ip checked since i used those alts too it showed up as my ip too and so he/she thought i was ban evading. now when i say daniel(numbers) and james (numbers) i mean there are numbers in their names that i am not 100% sure what they are. now i asked my neighbor and said he was on daniel(numbers) yesterday on arm because his was the ip would look almost identical because we share the same internet. Please look at this and think about it or look for other evidence because i love aem kitpvp and i would not even risk a 1% chance of getting found out for ban avoidance which in perm ban no appeal
     
  4. Christy

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +42
    @steviemcawsome

    There are a few things that you need to understand. Firstly, I am tempted to just decline all of this and ban you from forums because you are harassing me, nick, and others regarding this ban. That alone warrants a decline of an appeal. On top of that your previous appeal was already declined. Lastly, you have a history of disobeying rules, staff and having a lack of respect for the server. This does not at all reflect the attitude of someone who "loves aem."

    Here are some of the notes on your account:
    -disrespecting other players after being warned
    -spamming on multiple occasions
    -avoiding bans
    -harassing staff regarding bans

    Tomorrow, I am going to check what IP daniel200209 was logged in under when he was seen online. IF this IP matches yours this appeal is going to be declined and you are not to continue to harass staff regarding it or further action will be taken against you.
     
  5. steviemcawsome

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    Messages:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2
    if my ip isn't ddaniels what will happen
     
  6. Christy

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +42
    The last IP you logged in with on your account is the same IP that the account daniel200209 logged in on which means it was you. This appeal is declined for the following reasons:

    1. Original Appeal Declined
    2. Ban Evading
    3. Harassing staff regarding ban
    4. Lying to staff about ban evading
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.