[User Complaint] Oink_oink

Discussion in 'Complaints Archive' started by Turt201444444444, Jul 2, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Turt201444444444

    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    1,062
    Trophy Points:
    26,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,101
    Felon Username:
    OInk__Oink_
    Complaint:
    Sg hacking
    Evidence:

    @MSU_SPaRtAns321 wrote a thread in regards to oink_oink's possible sg hacking. The complaint was dismissed when @KHobbits and @Revanrose6 said that there is not enough evidence of hacking, because there was not way to tell whether miner1725 (the player being allegedly being hacked against) was hit by oink_oink or the player behind miner. However, watch the end of the video when miner returns to the /sg join area. The sg message says "Miner1725 was killed by Oink_oink with a STONE SWORD!" This is proof that Oink_Oink DID indeed hit him without facing him OR swinging a sword.

    I am happy to have found solid evidence of Oink_oink's hacking as all of us are tired of it.
     
    #1 Turt201444444444, Jul 2, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2014
  2. Revanrose6

    Revanrose6 Sith Lord
    ECC Sponsor Tycoon ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ I ⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,422
    Trophy Points:
    97,160
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +3,334
    So, you're saying it isn't possible that in a game with kitters that two people had a stone sword? I'm sorry but this is something that we already considered. There is no way to tell if Oink was the invisible player in that game or if Oink was behind him.

    Locked and Dismissed
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.