[Suggestion] Copyright or Patent Things Made/Invented By a User

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Vunthorghini, Sep 10, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Vunthorghini

    Vunthorghini Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    30,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +131
    Minecraft Name: Vunthorghini

    Suggestion: Give players the ability to apply for a Copyright or a Patent on things they made or invented (Builds, Graphics, ect)

    Reason: As a Graphic Designer and Architect on ECC, I wouldn't like to see either my graphics being copied by another player, nor would I like to see that a house I built had been copied to another place by someone else without my permission...
    In my opinion, this would protect the builder/designer rights and increase the creativity on the server. Another thing the copyright should protect is the build itself, for example, after I built something, I would copyright the build (applying on the server, and even maybe paying a fee to keep the copyright up and valid) and that copyright would make copying that build illegal, as well as it would make the demolition and change of the interior illegal, as long as that person didn't ask permission to the builder (owner of the copyright).

    Any Other Information: This suggestion is actually based in real life. Every building is copyrighted by the architect, so it can't be changed or copied.

    What do you guys think of this idea? Agree?

    Link To This Plugin/Is this a custom addition?: N/A
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  2. GStoner3

    GStoner3 President
    President ⛰️⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    Messages:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    32,105
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +364
    Believe it or not, I'm going to -1 this.

    Reasons:
    1. Since the upper UPPER Staff are the only ones that could worldedit to copy something, any "copies" must be built the same way, so one could only copy a design. One must still place blocks in order to attain a design, no magic wand waving ;)
    2. Copying a design is not illegal AS LONG AS CREDIT IS GIVEN (per Dewsy back in March '15) As an example, I have built a dragon statue and a Shield Helicarrier from pre-existing designs I found / Googled. Both structures have a plague (a keel plate, if you will) showing that I built it, but someone else designed it, thus giving credit to the original designer.
    3. There is a fuzzy line between copied and "influenced". Intellectual property rights are going to be a bit vague when we all make stuff on someone else's property (ECC). A legal system of rights and rules around that that would be cumbersome and interpretive per Staff member. (Think about it, after 4 years, we don't even have a definitive list of swear words... *grin*)
    4. Once someone buys something, either a pre-existing structure or a commission, they have the right to change their own property.
    5. If someone buys a town with a credited design structure, the town owner (new or original) has every right to demolish or change ANYthing inside their town. Town Owner rights are absolute, as they should be.
    So, I don't think we need rules, regulations, or protections regarding who designed what, but maybe something on the Wiki that states that that if one "copies" someone else's design, please put a (locked) sign on it somewhere to give the original designer credit for the idea. Maybe something additional for the Staff that tells them they may not LWC a locked "design credit" sign without already having the structure demolished.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  3. secretlondon

    secretlondon Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    Messages:
    173
    Trophy Points:
    15,790
    Ratings:
    +135
    -1 too. You can certainly modify your own building here.
     
  4. Vunthorghini

    Vunthorghini Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    30,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +131
    I understand your point on all these 5 statements. But, I'm gonna say my opinion for all of those

    1. (Buyer's Perspective) Imagine you pay 2+ million for a house, you want it to be unique, one off, you want it to be your own, you spend months waiting for it to be built, it's your "treasure". But then, someone out of nowhere types /wild land and luckily spawns near your 2+ million house. That player likes its design, sets home and copies it exactly how it looks like to his/her town, paying only for the materials (imagine 50k total). Don't you think all that waiting time, the money spent, the architect's creativity and time were completely devalued to 0?

    2. Continuing what I said above, I would feel very bad, if a design I created was copied, even if credit was given to me. This credit isn't worth the time the architect has spent building the house and thinking how it would look good, ect...

    3. I know, the copyright would only protect the house from being totally copied, there is no problem with influenced parts of the building, such as a similar facade

    4/5. I actually agree with these... :p
     
    #4 Vunthorghini, Sep 10, 2015
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2015
  5. GStoner3

    GStoner3 President
    President ⛰️⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2012
    Messages:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    32,105
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +364
    *ponders* Well, I guess we can continue answering eachothers points in a respectful and adult manner :)

    1) I agree that in real life that that is a very valid concern. However, in Minecraft (on any server), there is no innate ability to copyright designs. I know that real life has a slightly fuzzy line for copyright infringement. I remember that Vanilla Ice apparently added a single extra beat to a Queen song, and the judge allowed it. What if someone copied the 2.5M house exactly... in a different material? is it an actual copy? or merely a design influence? Another example would be if someone commissioned you to build a unique structure, with copyright rules implemented, YOU wouldn't be allowed to build another one EITHER... because the design now belongs to your build patron ;) I think that paying someone to build something "unique" for you means you are getting the FIRST one, but not the ONLY one ever.

    2) Personally (and only in game, not commenting on forum graphics), I would be happy if someone thought something I built was worthy of the flattery of spending the time to acquire the materials and stacking them in the exact same positions that I did. It would make me feel all warm and fuzzy that I inspired someone to build instead of the mindless chore of mining or farming. It takes WORK to build something. It takes SKILL to build something. It takes creativity to design it. I would consider it free advertising if someone copied my builds... especially since they had to go from what they can see. They sure ain't getting my design notes ;) If someone wants a building that looks just like mine, they can pay someone else to figure out how to build it, or... they can pay the actual designer who has built at least one. I would prefer to have the designer build it for me, even if it cost more.

    3) The problem would be figuring out how to write a tight enough definition that a) every Staff member would have the exact same viewpoint and b) there would be a defined "line" that says what is a copy and what is an influence. That level of rules detail would probably require pages of terms, definitions, rights, responsibilities, infringement punishments (and levels thereof), reporting mechanisms, etc. I would rather not have to deal with any of that, no matter WHAT direction I would be coming from. What happens if you design something that was influenced by a build you saw on a different server... that happens to fall on the "copy" side of the line when someone discovers the same build from 2 years ago elsewhere on ECC? Now you have to demolish something you spent weeks (months?) working on, all because a Staff member decides it's too similar. My opinion is that instituting copyright laws would STIFLE creativity, not encourage it. Could you imagine the records you would have to go through to make sure someone else didn't already build it? How long would it takes someone to just give up and not build anything beyond dirt square houses?

    I completely understand the direction you are coming from. I even agree with the idea behind it. I just think it would be too much of a hassle to implement the rules that would be needed. I love to build and overcome the challenges of "how the heck do I make this look right?", but I don't think I own any of it... I was just first ;)

    *hands the debate stick back*
     
  6. zr2002

    zr2002 Nub Moderator
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    5,384
    Trophy Points:
    73,660
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +3,154
    -100 this could seriously break the economy and there are soooo many flaws
     
  7. WindowBro33

    WindowBro33 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2014
    Messages:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    19,450
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +9
    -420blazeit420
     
  8. Vunthorghini

    Vunthorghini Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    30,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +131
    You managed to convince me! ;) It would take too much time to write all those rules and decide what would be considered a copyright violation and what wouldn't... It would all be too vague. The only thing I don't understand is why it would decrease the creativity... I think it would boost it, because the possibility to copy another house (as long as it was copyrighted) would be blocked.
    I agree with you when you said that instead of all of this, credit should be given to the original architect who built the house

    Destroy the economy? Do you mean people make money on ECC by copying each other builds and selling them?
     
  9. zr2002

    zr2002 Nub Moderator
    Resident ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    5,384
    Trophy Points:
    73,660
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +3,154
    Nono many people have the same business idea (for example casino games are pretty much the same) and will ruin lots of businesses
     
  10. kukelekuuk

    kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯ
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,007
    Trophy Points:
    84,160
    Ratings:
    +6,910
    *patents fishing towers* (Yes, I invented them.)

    gstoner summed up what my opinion on the matter is (and more).

    It sounds like a system that will be very complicated and inefficient, with little to no gain.
     
  11. UnitedStates2

    UnitedStates2 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,852
    Trophy Points:
    82,660
    Ratings:
    +6,293
    -1

    Sounds like a pointless and complicated system.
     
  12. Vunthorghini

    Vunthorghini Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 1, 2013
    Messages:
    359
    Trophy Points:
    30,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +131
    Yeah, I understand... You can lock it up if you want! :)
     
  13. kukelekuuk

    kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯ
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,007
    Trophy Points:
    84,160
    Ratings:
    +6,910
    Locked on request.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.