[SUGESTION STEALTH]

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by 98brando, Jul 11, 2012.

  1. 98brando

    98brando Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2012
    Messages:
    348
    Trophy Points:
    26,320
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +20
    Minecraft Name: 98brando

    Suggestion: today i have 2 sugestions that im not sure are possible or are disabled for certain reasons but i think that with stealth as you become a snowman i would like to be able to see your own snow path like others can see because i was having fun in pvp arena with snowman and people like its snowed? and so on bu i couldnt see it 8( so if we could do that great if not ok

    2nd sugestion if we morph into a mob i would like to see how i look if i press F5 but as we all know only others can see it but if we could change it so myself could see it as well great if not ok

    Reason: to have more fun 8)

    Any Other Information: i have been enjoying stealth { having fun with friends, scaring them with hostile mobs, pvp purposes its alot of fun i recomend you get it}

    Link To This Plugin: not sure where it is but its the $30 usd donation feature stealth
     
  2. thehockeykids2

    thehockeykids2 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,648
    Trophy Points:
    49,590
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,581
    I agree with number 2, i certainly buy stealth asap if that was the case
     
  3. kukelekuuk

    kukelekuuk C͕̹̲̽ͪ͐ͩ̔L̜̦̝͈ͦ̿̾̿ḘA̻̗̤̳̐ͭ̆̿̃̑ͭN̊̓͑̇ͯ
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    10,061
    Trophy Points:
    80,160
    Ratings:
    +6,925
    number 2 requires some clientside changes and changes to the plugin, meaning the plugin would have to be adapted for a mod and the mod has to be created.


    you can't see the snow because YOU are the "mob" creating the snow for people who see the actual mob instead of you, while you see yourself instead of the mob, this goes back to what I said about number 2.