IGN: @MassaHarambe Users Involved in this Contract: @svrbeek, @asmit10 General Purpose of Contract: Transferring of the Melon Sword (#JPMKQVRZ) ownership from @MassaHarambe to @svrbeek in exchange for $2,400,000 ECD. I (the contract initiator) agree to the following terms, and agree that my failure to complete such terms will result in a breach of contract, as outlined in Rule 3: @MassaHarambe ensures to transfer the ownership of the Melon Sword (#JPMKQVRZ) once the full payment of $2,400,000 ECD has been paid by @svrbeek and @asmit10 in the 8 week (56 days) time period. If two weeks of payments are not made within 8 weeks (56 days) after the approval date of this contract, @MassaHarambe may reclaim the Melon Sword (#JPMKQVRZ) with no refund and file a complaint for breach of contract where necessary punishment will be up to the discretion of Staff. The other user(s) involved with this contract must agree to the following terms: @svrbeek will transfer $600,000 ECD within 24 hours of this contract's approval. @svrbeek and @asmit10 agree to transfer $1,800,000 ECD on a payment to @MassaHarambe within 8 weeks (56 days) of this contract's approval at a chest shop located at x: 40 y: 63 z: -10892 where it will be setup in 8 increments of $225,000 ECD. The payment plan schedule will follow as: Week 1 @svrbeek (1/28/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 2 @asmit10 (2/4/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 3 @svrbeek (2/11/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 4 @asmit10 (2/18/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 5 @svrbeek (2/25/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 6 @asmit10 (3/3/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 7 @svrbeek (3/10/2020): $225,000 ECD Week 8 @asmit10 (3/17/2020): $225,000 ECD @svrbeek and @asmit10 agree that if two weeks of payments are not made within 8 weeks (56 days) after the approval date of this contract that @MassaHarambe may reclaim the Melon Sword (#JPMKQVRZ) with no refund and file a complaint for breach of contract where necessary punishment will be up to the discretion of Staff. I agree that the terms in this contract are subject to all of EcoCityCraft's rules, including the rules listed specifically in this forum. I understand that the contract may be affected by future changes in EcoCityCraft rules and server updates, and I accept that due to the possibility of such changes, this contract may be at my own risk. I understand that the contents of this contract are subject to staff assessment, review and approval before it is a binding contract under EcoCityCraft rules. I accept that action may not be taken in case of a breach of contract if appropriate and sufficient evidence is not provided of such.: I agree
Hello @asmit10, @svrbeek and @MassaHarambe Before I can approve this contract I need svrbeek and asmit10 to come up with a payment plan between each other, figure out who is going to be paying Massa on what date. So perhaps asmit, you can pay 1 week, then svrbeek you can pay the next week. The reason I am asking for this is if one of you's decides to duck out, and miss a payment, you will both be punished for it, please consult with each other and notify Massaharambe of what works out best for you two. @MassaHarambe please edit this contract when this has been done, with the updated payment plan and both @asmit10 and @svrbeek you will have to agree again.
It's fine to me if we are both punished upon missing a payment. There is literally no incentive for me and svrbeek to do as you're requesting. We live together so this is a non issue. I hope this is fine as long as we both agree to it.
Oh yea we are close enough that no payment plan is needed between us, just between us and MassaHarambe I am fine for us both to be punish given the circumstances aren't followed.
Hi guys. I know what you mean, but purely from an enforcement point of view it would be a lot better to come up with a schedule, it's easy to miss a payment and the last thing we want is for both of you to be in trouble. Like I said, perhaps a payment plan where each week 1 of you would be responsible in giving the money to Massa, then between you two you can pay each other the amount that is required.
It's amazing to me that you're saying "I won't let three consenting people agree to a contract because I don't think that's what you want", when everyone involved is saying, "no, that's what we want". I don't really care to deal with the BS to be frank. I thought this would be as simple as reading a contract and agreeing to it. Not altering the contract due to the discretion of a staff member, despite all parties agreeing and UNDERSTANDING the consequences and the contract in place. Massa can do whatever he wants in terms of editing the contract, i don't care to deal with the hassle to be honest. EDIT: "...from an enforcement perspective" I forgot to comment on this point. In your previous post you said that we would both be punished, which we already took as an implication, and agreed to, and yet now you're saying that "from an enforcement perspective" the contract needs to be changed. Would we both be punished or is the contract invalid due to some rules on contracts? It can't be both, surely
It is our job to make sure contracts are enforceable before accepting, it is part of the approval process. This is to make sure contracts are safe for all parties. It is very easy to agree to something that could land you in a world of hurt, or extreme debt. We only ask for changes when contracts have issues that make it hard/impossible for us to enforce properly. Group contracts are fine as long as everyone's role is clearly defined. We are not inclined to hold all of a participating party responsible based on the potential actions of one user. If we had a larger group of users this could get extremely messy should that group default on the deal. It isn't something we're doing to make your life difficult, it is a policy we maintain for all types of this contract. Please do as we ask, so we can proceed to get the deal settled. Speak with Massa about how to amend the contract so it is due and proper.
If this was the first response from sneaky, something along the lines of "We can't accept the contract due to the fact that both players would need to be punished, and that isn't something we do" i'd have been more understanding. I took sneaky's first response as "I won't approve this contract because both players would be punished, and I don't think that's something you guys want". If it's a rule that all contracts abide by, then that's fine by me. It just seemed like a mod trying to protect people who know full well what they're doing. We'll sort it out with Massa, and thanks for the clarification.
Contract Approved. Please remember to take time stamped screenshots of the transaction by double tapping the F2 key.
