***I know that an entire map reset is very unlikely, but I just want to see what people have to say about it.*** There has been a lot of discusssion about this topic, and I just want to make a post (not a suggestion) to see what people think. How it would work is, first, Andrew would add a second mainworld. Then, Mayors+ could apply for their towns to be copied to the new world. People that do not copy or want to copy their towns will get town credits. They will be able to start a new town. As far as people having a lot of items, both worlds would need to be open, so that people could move their items to the new world. This would be over a 2-3 month period to ensure that all players get to move their things. That would also allow a lot of time for the town to be moved over. Pros: Map will start out fresh, and ungriefed. All parts of map updated, not jus the outskirts. Gets rid of unused towns. New landscape. It would just be cool, in my opinion, to have a new world. Cons: People gone for 2-3 month periods at a time would be mad. Lots of work for Andrew. People may not get their towns copied in time. Possible limit for copied towns. People losing items. Just post what you think.
I agree. I have always denied a map reset for towns, but your idea for the towns is amazing. If this was ever going to happen (probs not) this would be my preffered way.
Well the problem I would have with your town moving suggestion is we would lose good towns whose owners are banned or inactive. A good example of this is Wolvied2gmark’s galleries. I would hate to see those gone, because they do have good pixel art.
2-3 Months of a whole other world would be far too much. I'd give it 2 weeks at max, to be honest. In the likelyhood that a map reset is absolutely necessary, Andrew has already said that everything(Ranks/Town wise) would be reset. We'd all start on a relatively 'level' playing field as we did months ago, though donation features (and i believe balances) would be kept.
