Denied [Main Server Suggestion] Spawn in multiple pets instead of only 2

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Videowiz92, Jan 15, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Videowiz92

    Mythic ⚔️ I ⚔️ ECC Benefactor President ⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐⭐ X ⭐⭐ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    3,021
    Trophy Points:
    77,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +1,183
    In Game Name:
    Videowiz92
    What part of EcoCityCraft is this suggestion for:
    Main Server
    Short title for your suggestion:
    Spawn in multiple pets instead of only 2
    What are you suggesting:
    To be able to spawn in multiple pets. As per my bug report here, you can split the stack of pet riders (resulting in sketchy behavior) but I would like to be able to use more than 2 pets at a time.
    Why is this a good addition for EcoCityCraft?:
    The shop features 62 different pet types. This should be a no-brainer as to why I wish to use more than just a measly 2 pets at a time. Similar to how I can use all trails at once, I should be able to show off all my pets at once.

    This would also give more attention to our pets and thus more people would buy pets from the store.
    Other information:
    This should be possible and I wouldn't see any disagreements to this by removing the rider part of the plugin and allowing users to spawn more pets in through commands.

    Syntax example would be /pet <type> <type> <type> to spawn in 3 different pets. Restrictions could be put in for how many of a specific pet type as well as the syntax length.
    Plugin or custom addition:
    Pet plugin
    One suggestion per form:
    I Understand.
     
    #1 Videowiz92, Jan 15, 2020
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2020
  2. andrewkm

    Founder Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    20,370
    Trophy Points:
    102,160
    Ratings:
    +15,065
    Won’t happen due to the state of development with our pet plugin.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.