1. What is your In-Game-Name? PvPMaster911 2. Have you read the in-depth instructions for this application? Yes 3. Are we removing LWC Protections or Trade Signs? LWC protections 4. What town are these in? Please provide the town application. Dark_Springs https://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/president-application-pvpmaster911.170967/ 5. Which world is this town in? Rising 6. Who do these protections belong to? JLyonns UUID: 9c611326-e53b-91b2-9d72-699896f7ef6c 7. Is the player who owns this/these inactive? Have you asked them to remove them? Inactive/Broke City Rules/Missed $1k payment 8. Please provide the following information for each area of protections. -12199, 63, -10887 1x Double Chest -12202, 63, -10886 1x Double Chest 9. Are any of the protections listed located in a PvP-enabled area? No 10. Why are you requesting these be removed? Cleaning out inactive Town Members/Don’t want rule breakers in my town.
@PvPMaster911 @JLyonns has only been offline for 5 days - You need to be offline 7 days+ to meet the inactivity criteria for LWCs. You do say that the user has broken city rules/missed a 1k payment, however - Do you have proof of a valid eviction notice being issued to back this up?
Yes, I’ve posted a sign just like server rules says (3 Day Notice) and I’ve screenshotted him agreeing to town rules.
@UnitedStates2 The first image is the "Rules and Regulations" agreement. All rules can be found at /warp dark_springs. The second image is the 3 signs I put in front of his houses about 5 or more days ago. He had to pay a fine of $1k which was in the agreement if you were caught breaking the rules. Fines and punishment details can be found at /warp dark_springs. The fact that no response was taken place, I put up the "Eviction Sign" following the server's "3-Day Eviction Notice" rule.
Unfortunately signs aren't valid eviction notices - Rather, an eviction notice may only be given by in-game (either by PM or /mail) or by tagging evicted users in a thread in the Town Evicitions subforum in the Towns Discussion section. Do you have any proof of this?
Oh, well no. I guess I’ll wait until we reach the 7-day mark which would be for the “inactive” user cleanup.
