[LWC Protections Removal] frenchhorn2617

Discussion in 'LWC & Chestshop Removal Requests' started by frenchhorn2617, Sep 7, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. frenchhorn2617

    frenchhorn2617 President
    President ⛰️⛰️ Ex-Resident ⚒️

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Messages:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    14,370
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +4
    In Game Name:
    frenchhorn2617
    Have you read the in-depth application instruction:
    I have read the instructions.
    Which server is this application taking place in:
    Main
    Are we removing LWC Protections or Chest Shops:
    LWC Protections
    What town are these in:
    frenchhorntown
    Original town application link:
    Which user do these protections currently belong to:
    anastasiabword
    Is the player who owns the protections inactive:
    yes
    Provide the X Y Z coordinates, number, and type of protections:
    -6782, 68, 5,816
    Are any of the protections listed located in a PvP-enabled area:
    No
    Why are you requesting these protections be removed:
    player is gone from the server
    Processing time within 24 hours:
    I Understand.
     
  2. neecoalage

    neecoalage Always sleepy.
    ECC Sponsor EcoLegend ⛰️⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VIII ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    1,567
    Trophy Points:
    70,910
    Ratings:
    +506
    Hello @frenchhorn2617 at this time we will not be able to remove these locks for you.

    Protections may only be removed if one of the following are true:
    (If using anything but the first you must provide evidence of this.)

    • The protection owner is offline over 7 days.
    • The protection owner has been given proper notice and request to remove their locks.
    • The protection owner has been banned from the server for Moderate+ grief of your town.
    This player has only been offline for 6 days 2 hours.

    LWC closed, please refile when one of the above has been completed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.