Lottery not always won

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Zothar, May 4, 2012.

  1. Zothar

    Zothar Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2012
    Messages:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    25,430
    Ratings:
    +0
    Minecraft Name: Zothar

    Suggestion: Perhaps there should be a chance that instead of the lottery always being won by a ticket, and thus its buyer, selected at random, no winner is declared and the pot is kept for the next lottery round.

    Reason: This might encourage larger pots to happen more often if there is some chance that the lottery is not won and the pot continues to grow. If at the end of a lottery round, no winner is chosen and the pot size and number of players is announced, that might draw more participation for the next round, much as larger real-world lottery pots tend to if no one's chosen the winning numbers for a few rounds. I thought I'd offer this idea for a lottery change that might make things more interesting and that has nothing to do with "fair" since a random distribution is, well, random.

    Any Other Information: None other than this mechanism for lottery pots to grow similarly to how real-world pots sometimes grow and may have the corresponding rise in lottery participation.

    Link To This Plugin: I've not looked for a plugin for this. I assume that either the current lottery is an off-the-shelf plugin, in which case changes may not be that practical, or it may be custom code written by the EcoCityCraft developers.
     
  2. Crossphyre

    Crossphyre Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    28,790
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +146
    I dont think Andrew will change it. He said in another post that the lotto will NEVER change.
     
  3. MsMoofin

    MsMoofin (Don't) Paddle (the) Cow
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,963
    Trophy Points:
    48,090
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +829
    When Andrew says lotto will never change, he honestly says it because every suggestion - except this one - is about making it more "fair." This would not change the fair factor.

    I think this suggestion is interesting, but I don't do much with the lotto in the first place. xD
     
  4. celo747

    celo747 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2012
    Messages:
    576
    Trophy Points:
    26,970
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +3
    i think andrew should use the one thing he did before were were when a tick is bought in the last 5min it goes back up to 5 min
     
  5. Crossphyre

    Crossphyre Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    28,790
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +146
    I agree, this would be pretty cool, and I hope Andrew considers this suggestion. :)
     
  6. D0rc

    D0rc Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,598
    Trophy Points:
    32,290
    Ratings:
    +110
    This is the first lottery suggestion that I've ever seen that isn't about making it more 'fair'. Finally something about lottery that hasn't been suggested 5 billion times before. <3

    Anyway, this is definitely an interesting idea and I like it. The problem would be getting the percent chance right to have someone not win, as well as coding it, as I don't think this exists in the code already.