IGN: RyanBlocks2 Suggestion: If you kill a player with a fire weapon in SG you should be extinguished. Reason: It feels really bad to kill someone in SG only to burn to death afterwards. Even if you win the fight against fire which is hard enough you then almost certainly die. This would encourage people to fight people with fire instead of options only being run away or kill the other player and burn to death.
-1, If you died from fire then the person that fought you did enough damage for the fire to kill you. This is a fair ingame mechanic.
I think he means that after you 1v1 somebody in SG. It is kind of unfair as I could just watch two people fight it out and lightly tap them once the game resets to the next deathmatch. 10 seconds is hardly enough time to eat 10 hunger worth of food and then heal any bars.
Enough Damage is almost none, All this creates is suicide fire users instead of people who use their kit properly
Ahh, I did not understand that is what you meant. It can also be hard, because people can team and do this tatic. From this viewpoint I can understand what you mean. However, I think +1/-1
Usually fire swords put you at a disadvantage (damage wise) so just because of that I wouldn't like to see a change because most of the kills I get with these swords are due to the after life kills from the fire.
No. Doing it this way limits tactics. I'll give an example: Say I have a fire sword and I see 2 people battling it out. I run up to them, set them on fire and back off. I then wait for one of them to die or run away and finish them off. This is the appeal of a fire weapon. Note that burning stops someone from running due to the damage received. So it would be easy to catch up to them.
