Change How Hackers Are Reported

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by VivienLeigh, Jun 13, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VivienLeigh

    VivienLeigh Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    16,140
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +183
    Minecraft Name: Empress_Cixi

    Suggestion: Change the way that hackers are reported, because its definitely not working at all

    Reason: I have seen numerous hackers in the sg games, yet as the rule stands now, a video must be recorded before anything can even be done. I asked all of the staff members that were on, yet none knew how, or had the ability to record, in addition to numerous players that I asked. I have seen these hackers earn thousands upon thousands off of the sg game, and make a mockery of the economy that andrew and other staff members have worked so hard to protect. Even when a video is recorded, its always questioned, and more evidence is asked for. But how is a person supposed to record a hacker, when they are trying to play the game. If a person follows around the hacker, the hacker uses their hacks and kills the person before enough evidence is gathered. I believe there should be a way that I can tell the staff that I believe a person is hacking, and then that person is spectated (either by a person capable of making the decision, or a person capable of recording video that can then be passed on to someone (s) that can make the decision). As the rule stands now, it is almost impossible to catch a hacker, and when one is finally caught, they have already caused tremendous damage. Also as the rule stands now, it literally PAYS TO BE A HACKER (like literally, in the amount of thousands of dollars).

    Any Other Information: I think that when over 10 people recognize that a person is hacking, something should be done, because I speak to people that corroborate the same things that I am saying. And now that SG games pay even more, the hackers can make even more profit. I'm not sure how the people who have X-Ray hacks are caught, but I notice that the server is far better at catching them, so if the same thing could be implemented on the sg hackers, it would be great, because frankly, the sg hackers make EVEN MORE than a person who was using an xray hack to mine for ores, because sg pays far more in far less time.

    Additionally, if this is not possible, could something be done to educate the staff on how to record video or recognize hacks/ give them the ability to spectate.

    Thanks for your help!!
     
    • Potato Potato x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
  2. Queen_Brookiee

    Queen_Brookiee Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2016
    Messages:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    10,620
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +36
    I agree. I've seen hackers in SG before. Not to point out who, but I've seen killaura, reach, spider, etc...
    Frankly, I endorse that a new reporting system should be introduced. Using cheats to farm for money in SG really does disrupt the economy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Potato Potato x 1
    • List
  3. strongpelt

    strongpelt ~*Alaskan Sponsor*~
    Mythic ⚔️ I ⚔️ ECC Sponsor Tycoon ⛰️⛰️⛰️ Ex-EcoLegend ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Prestige ⭐ VII ⭐ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2016
    Messages:
    1,046
    Trophy Points:
    68,660
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +2,111
    -1 cause of this. Some people are just really good at pvp, know tips (like jumping to get caught up to people), or simply theres lag involved. Unless by something you mean investigated. If you mean start banning or something then no. Also, to be fair, google is a wonderful tool to use in finding out how to record :) so's youtube. Just google "how to record minecraft videos". Fairly easy. Also, another point, hacking is VERY hard to tell in sg. Even serves that ONLY do sg have a very hard time, So many factors can be at play in sg.
     
  4. ScopicX

    ScopicX Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Messages:
    1,220
    Trophy Points:
    17,290
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +852
    This suggestion has many flaws. One of them is the 'voting to see if he/she gets banned'. I could literally report you and pay 10 people 50k each to vote that you were indeed hacking.

    I do like your intention, but I cant see this implemented.

    -1
     
  5. ChaaadMaxxx

    ChaaadMaxxx fσσтвαℓℓ α∂∂ιςт єςσℓєα∂єя
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Messages:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    23,690
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +276
    -1
    Literally exactly what he said.

    I know why you are making this suggestion, you obviously don't like logan because he is an amazing pvp'er. This would cause lawlessness and everyone that a few people didn't like would get banned. "Oh wait, this is the guy that always rekts me, let's vote to ban them so we can actually not get killed"

    The logic here is non-existant
     
  6. VivienLeigh

    VivienLeigh Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2015
    Messages:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    16,140
    Gender:
    Female
    Ratings:
    +183
    well maybe thats because you failed to read, and misinterpreted what i wrote.... next time read it before you comment something idiotic and misinterpret everything
     
  7. ctop_1013

    ctop_1013 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2014
    Messages:
    230
    Trophy Points:
    24,560
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +172
    There are good ideas, decent ideas, terrible ideas, and then there is this
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Potato Potato x 1
    • List
  8. oootopia

    oootopia Utopian
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2015
    Messages:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    43,590
    Ratings:
    +4,950
    Locked By Request
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.