Change back to old LWC Limits

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by rockboy2000, Jan 4, 2013.

?

Do you want to go back to the old LWC Limits?

  1. Yes!

    74.1%
  2. No, I'm perfectly happy

    25.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rockboy2000

    rockboy2000 Mayor
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,344
    Trophy Points:
    50,410
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +310
    Minecraft Name: rockboy2000

    Suggestion: We change back to the old LWC Limits when Mayors had 300, Presidents had 500 etc.

    Reason: I have 249/150 locks meaning I can't lock any of my chests. This means people can steal from the chests and I loose items and money. If it was made against the rules to open any chest you don't own I would be fine but that is not the case.

    Any Other Information: I believe this was implemented to encourage (almost force) users to donate for unlimited LWC.

    Link To This Plugin: N/A

    Edit: Spelt "the" wrong in the poll question. Don't arrest me grammar police, it was a mistake!
     
    #1 rockboy2000, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  2. xX3PICREBELXx

    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoMaster ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,201
    Trophy Points:
    54,090
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2,608
    I Completely agree. I understand how the server needs donations to stay up and stuff of that nature, but pretty much forcing people into buying is just a horrible method of doing it. I was planning on purchasing unlimited lwc's when i reached 500, as I'm now currently on 469/300 but now I guess I need to purchase it or i can't do anything with locks.
     
  3. rockboy2000

    rockboy2000 Mayor
    Mayor ⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,344
    Trophy Points:
    50,410
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +310
    And you must remember it isn't like the server gets no donations, many people donate for other extras.
     
  4. JacksonML

    JacksonML Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    26,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +25
    I was just about to post something like this. I have 116/50 locks, and I'm a comayor of a town! That's absurd, and I was about to make a casino, requiring locks. I just donated for water and multihome, and I don't have the money for another donation feature, because the next one on my list of wanting was tp. This is really absurd. I really don't understand the change. Even 10 for builders is crazy! I had about 12 double chests when i was a builder! Plus doors, trapdoors, dispensers, buttons, levers, pressure plates, and signs. So I used most of my locks. I really do not understand why this was needed. It was perfect as it was!

    EDIT:
    After I FINALLY get mayor, I would probably have about 4 locks left from what I'm planning to do.
     
    #4 JacksonML, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  5. EpicAssassin158

    EpicAssassin158 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    360
    Trophy Points:
    26,350
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +36
    HAha luckly I just applied for president !
     
  6. jwpwns

    jwpwns ECC Sponsor
    ECC Sponsor President ⛰️⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    2,577
    Trophy Points:
    67,160
    Gender:
    Male
    EcoDollars:
    $0
    Ratings:
    +1,633
    +1
     
    #6 jwpwns, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  7. antcubing

    antcubing Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2011
    Messages:
    999
    Trophy Points:
    29,090
    Ratings:
    +58
    Many people are quitting due to this. Although I am not affected much, the downgrade on the amount of locks you could place was a terrible idea. It was perfectly fine the way it was , and probably only changed so that people could get UnlimitedLwcs. It should be changed back.
     
  8. Lee1104

    Lee1104 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Tycoon ⚜️⚜️⚜️

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,922
    Trophy Points:
    31,940
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +322
    46 LWC's over my limit. The only reason we lock all our signs is that we don't want random people locking them. If they lock it and refuse to unlock it, filing an LWC removal is a pain.
     
  9. JacksonML

    JacksonML Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    26,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +25
    Also to make people not break certain blocks
     
  10. oOscarletOo

    oOscarletOo Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    225
    Trophy Points:
    25,800
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +13
    +1 I am going to have to buy unlimited lwc if this doesn't change instead of what I wanted to :(
     
  11. mattybillo1

    mattybillo1 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    529
    Trophy Points:
    27,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +117
    I disagree with increasing them. LWC are stored on a server in a cache the smaller the cache the less lag. Not only is this meaning there will be less lag for the server it will also prompt more donations for the server, which is only a plus. I am a president with 121 locks, If you have 200 chests locked try going through and selling some of the materials you probably don't need and make some good money whilst doing so.
    I understand as a resident you have very few locks and I would advise people to buy mayor, this add even more advantages to buying new ranks.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • List
    #11 mattybillo1, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  12. xX3PICREBELXx

    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoMaster ⚜️⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    2,201
    Trophy Points:
    54,090
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +2,608
    NO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  13. JacksonML

    JacksonML Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    26,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +25
    Ok, so by decreasing LWCs, there will be less lag. Get that. More people will buy Unlimited LWCs, ok thats good, people are donating to the server. But then there's a lot of more LWC's completely doing nothing good. If lots of LWCs lag the server, then why make people want to get UNLIMITED LWCs?!
     
    #13 JacksonML, Jan 4, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2013
  14. mattybillo1

    mattybillo1 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    529
    Trophy Points:
    27,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +117
    More donations mean better hardware and hosting, so less lag.
     
  15. JacksonML

    JacksonML Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    304
    Trophy Points:
    26,120
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +25
    But, just because the server gets donations, doesn't mean that we can always get better hardware. Andrew has to pay for electric bills, internet bills, and service bills. Its not that cheap with Ventrilo, a Website, and a Minecraft Server, all 24/7.
     
  16. WhiteSoxFan123

    WhiteSoxFan123 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2012
    Messages:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    26,240
    Ratings:
    +81
    this is not a big deal, you should never need more than 50 lwc's anyway, just combine items in chests (in other words you can't have a chest devoted solely to mushrooms or whatever anymore) how sad...
     
  17. mattybillo1

    mattybillo1 Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-President ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    529
    Trophy Points:
    27,440
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +117
    I was suggesting this change in LWC's will mean MORE donations will be done, so andrewkm will get extra money to spend on the server than he gets at the moment.
     
  18. zardgyer

    zardgyer Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    2,530
    Trophy Points:
    45,740
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +509
    Is there a way to add lwcs to worldguard? I mean, that only those who have perms in the town may lock the item? I can check in a few hours, but this might make it so those in towns don't have to lock everything.
     
  19. ringmikey

    ringmikey Builder
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-Mayor ⚒️⚒️

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    25,430
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +13
    SWITCH IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ignore Mayors and Presidents.....They get a lot of LWCs I am in the Middle of Building a Store and now I have to stop because I don't have enough.......I don't want to save up vote money and have wait 80 day just to get mayor and then have to save up again to get president. To tell you the truth it is CRAZY to change it in the first place! Why would you. Everything was fin until this happens! SWITCH IT BACK! VOTE SWITCH IT BACK ABOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad::(:confused::p
     
  20. welikeike22

    welikeike22 Dean Martin
    Builder ⛰️ Ex-EcoLeader ⚜️⚜️⚜️ Gameplay Architect Premium Upgrade

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,050
    Trophy Points:
    66,660
    Gender:
    Male
    Ratings:
    +987
    This actually infuriates me. As an Ecoleader with 15 towns, and i had the maximum amount of LWCS available at the time. I was using 500/500 and that wasn't even enough to suffice for me. There is literally no way i can reduce that amount down to 300 without seriously risking things in my towns.

    When the twitter post said it would "Mainly pertain to Builders/Residents", it was dead wrong. It effects Mayors+ more than Residents and Builders; Far more actually. For someone like myself who has been around for 2 years on this server, the expectation that we should only "need" 300 LWCs, in-fact using far less, is dead wrong and in my opinion outrageous.

    If, like you suggest Mattybillo1, that LWCS "Cause Mass Lag", then UnlimitedLWC wouldn't be $15. It would be significantly higher to keep everyone from buying it with USD or Ecodollars for USD.

    If we're going to decrease the general allocation of LWC rights, then at-least give Tycoons/Ecoleaders additional LWCs for their time spent on the server and their dedication towards it.

    I'd atleast like an explanation as to why LWCS were dropped down.
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.