Minecraft Username: Shrinkwrap4me Reason of Ban: View attachment 685 Rule violated: Clause 2 - Scamming A general definition of a scam in the context of EcoCityCraft is a transaction in which a user pays for goods or services from another user, and does not receive those goods/services in the agreed upon timeframe. Failing to uphold your end of the deal is scamming, and is punishable by a ban. Your continuance on the server may rely on you following through with your end of the deal, or refunding what you scammed, solely at the staff’s discretion. Please explain in your own words what the rule(s) means: A fraudulent scheme performed by a dishonest individual group, or company in an attempt to obtain money or something else of value. It's a confidence game or other fraudulent scheme, especially for making a quick profit; swindle. Reason you feel you think you should be unbanned: I personally thought that I had every right to sell the town. I had bought the town through partyman909's town claim. Which can be found here; http://imgur.com/BDsi2zD,FofZw8a,OHdQjiM,egbbZiz. Here's also the link (http://www.ecocitycraft.com/forum/threads/town-claim-2.108112/#post-570579) for the town claim app, at the bottom, it clearly shows partyman909 saying, "Shrinkwrap4me is paying me 200,000 for the town claim." I feel as if I've been scammed. I'm sorry @GoddessLaverna that you were the victim of this trade. If I'm unbanned, I will be glad to refund what you lost. If I happen to be unbanned, you won't see any foolish actions like this happen again. Once again, I'm sorry to what had happened.
Yes moderators, this is a relevant post. His definition of scamming is taken from an Internet dictionary, when it clearly states to "Please explain in your own words" what scamming means. The fact that he has failed to do so, and would rather copy and paste from Dictionary.com shows that he may or may not be fully remorseful for his actions.
The evidence provided here shows you did have the right to sell the town -- I'm not quite sure why you didn't post the screenshots on the complaint Partyman filed as they would have been a more than adequate defense. @partyman909 Do you have any evidence that the transaction @shrinkwrap4me is showing was reversed? If it wasn't, did you knowingly file the complaint even though Shrink rightfully owned the town?
part of the deal was that i was to not lose ownership so why would he have the right to sell it if i would lose my perms as one of the owners? you can even see in the screenshot he agreed to not get rid of my ownership so where did i go wrong may i ask?
Patyman909, my friend asked me politely that he needed me to photoshop something. So I asked, what, he gave me this screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/maGmOtq.png. So I photoshopped shrink & I said. I on;y did it to be nice, didn't think that partyman909 would ever do this. Eventhough skype evidence can't be used, you can clearly see that partyman909's honest intentions were to scam shrink via this screenshot: http://gyazo.com/fad1244f1f86b8ee6e86e2f396baa6d1 p.s. sorry for doing a bad job of it the text is really fuzzy XD
um my screenshot was never photo shopped? but okay nice try http://imgur.com/maGmOtq and that's the actual link without .png
You have been issued a forum warning for inappropriate content and making irrelevant posts on appeals.
After reviewing the evidence: Shrink legally owns the town, but didn't have permission to remove party / sell it. As a result I've readded shrink as an owner since he does own it according to the sale. Shrink, make sure you reread our rules so an issue like this doesn't happen in the future. Shrink's tempban reset to 7 days.
